ATI Radeon HD 4250 IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
Graphics Processor
| GPU model | RS880 | GT218 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
| Manufacturing process | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Number of transistors | 181 million | 260 million |
| Die size | 67 mm² | 57 mm² |
| GPU variant | — | GT218-300-A2 |
| Foundry | — | TSMC |
Integrated Graphics
| Release date | Mar 1st, 2010 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | Radeon IGP (HD 4000) | — |
| Production | End-of-life | — |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | — |
| Successor | Sumo | — |
Clocks
| GPU clock | 560 MHz | 520 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Memory clock | System Shared | 400 MHz 800 Mbps effective |
| Shader clock | — | 1230 MHz |
Memory Configuration
| Memory size | System Shared | 512 MB |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 bit |
| Bandwidth | System Dependent | 6.400 GB/s |
Render Configuration
| Shading units | 40 | 16 |
|---|---|---|
| TMUs | 4 | 8 |
| ROPs | 4 | 4 |
| Compute units | 2 | — |
| SM count | — | 2 |
| Cache L2 | — | 32 KB |
Performance
| Pixel rate | 2.240 GPixel/s | 2.080 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Texture rate | 2.240 GTexel/s | 4.160 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | 44.80 GFLOPS | 39.36 GFLOPS |
Dimensions & Outputs
| Slot width | IGP | Single-slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | unknown | 31 W |
| Outputs | No outputs | 1x DVI1x DisplayPort1x VGA |
| Length | — | 168 mm 6.6 inches |
| Suggested PSU | — | 200 W |
| Power connectors | — | None |
| Board number | — | P691, P873 |
API Support & Features
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 11.1 (10_1) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | — | — |
| Shader model | 4.1 | 4.1 |
| CUDA | — | 1.2 |
Other Features
Graphics Card
| Release date | — | Oct 12th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | — | GeForce 200 |
| Production | — | End-of-life |
| Interface | — | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Predecessor | — | GeForce 9 |
| Successor | — | GeForce 400 |
