NVIDIA GeForce 9400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
Graphics Processor
| GPU model | C79 | G96C |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Manufacturing process | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Number of transistors | 314 million | 314 million |
| Die size | 144 mm² | 121 mm² |
| GPU variant | — | N10P-GE1 |
| Foundry | — | TSMC |
Integrated Graphics
| Release date | Apr 17th, 2007 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | GeForce 9 IGP | — |
| Production | End-of-life | — |
| Interface | PCI | — |
| Reviews | 6 in our database | — |
| Predecessor | GeForce 8 IGP | — |
Clocks
| GPU clock | 450 MHz | 600 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Shader clock | 1100 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory clock | System Shared | 800 MHz 1600 Mbps effective |
Memory Configuration
| Memory size | System Shared | 1024 MB |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 bit |
| Bandwidth | System Dependent | 25.60 GB/s |
Render Configuration
| Shading units | 16 | 32 |
|---|---|---|
| TMUs | 8 | 16 |
| ROPs | 4 | 8 |
| SM count | 2 | 4 |
| Cache L2 | — | 32 KB |
Performance
| Pixel rate | 1.800 GPixel/s | 4.800 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Texture rate | 3.600 GTexel/s | 9.600 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | 35.20 GFLOPS | 96.00 GFLOPS |
Dimensions & Outputs
| Slot width | IGP | — |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40 W | 23 W |
| Outputs | 1x DVI1x VGA1x S-Video | No outputs |
API Support & Features
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | — | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | — | — |
| Shader model | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| CUDA | — | 1.1 |
Other Features
Mobile graphics
| Release date | — | Jan 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | — | GeForce 100M |
| Production | — | End-of-life |
| Interface | — | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Reviews | — | 2 in our database |
| Predecessor | — | GeForce 9M |
| Successor | — | GeForce 200M |
