NVIDIA GeForce 9400 vs NVIDIA GeForce G102M
Graphics Processor
| GPU model | C79 | C79 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Manufacturing process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Number of transistors | 314 million | 314 million |
| Die size | 144 mm² | 144 mm² |
| GPU variant | — | MCP79MX |
Integrated Graphics
| Release date | Apr 17th, 2007 | Jan 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | GeForce 9 IGP | GeForce 100M |
| Production | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Interface | PCI | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Reviews | 6 in our database | 2 in our database |
| Predecessor | GeForce 8 IGP | GeForce 9M |
| Successor | — | GeForce 200M |
Clocks
| GPU clock | 450 MHz | 450 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Shader clock | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Memory clock | System Shared | System Shared |
Memory Configuration
| Memory size | System Shared | System Shared |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | System Shared |
| Bandwidth | System Dependent | System Dependent |
Render Configuration
| Shading units | 16 | 16 |
|---|---|---|
| TMUs | 8 | 8 |
| ROPs | 4 | 4 |
| SM count | 2 | 2 |
Performance
| Pixel rate | 1.800 GPixel/s | 1.800 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Texture rate | 3.600 GTexel/s | 3.600 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | 35.20 GFLOPS | 35.20 GFLOPS |
Dimensions & Outputs
| Slot width | IGP | IGP |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40 W | 14 W |
| Outputs | 1x DVI1x VGA1x S-Video | No outputs |
API Support & Features
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | — | — |
| Vulkan | — | — |
| Shader model | 4.0 | 4.0 |
