NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
Graphics Processor
| GPU model | GT216 | G96 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
| Foundry | TSMC | UMC |
| Manufacturing process | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Number of transistors | 486 million | 314 million |
| Die size | 100 mm² | 144 mm² |
| GPU variant | — | NB9P-GE |
Graphics Card
| Release date | Sep 4th, 2009 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | GeForce 200 | — |
| Production | End-of-life | — |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | — |
| Predecessor | GeForce 9 | — |
| Successor | GeForce 400 | — |
Clocks
| GPU clock | 475 MHz | 500 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Shader clock | 1100 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory clock | 400 MHz 800 Mbps effective | 800 MHz 1600 Mbps effective |
Memory Configuration
| Memory size | 1024 MB | 512 MB |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR3 |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 bit |
| Bandwidth | 6.400 GB/s | 25.60 GB/s |
Render Configuration
| Shading units | 16 | 16 |
|---|---|---|
| TMUs | 8 | 8 |
| ROPs | 4 | 8 |
| SM count | 2 | 2 |
| Cache L2 | 32 KB | 32 KB |
Performance
| Pixel rate | 1.900 GPixel/s | 4.000 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Texture rate | 3.800 GTexel/s | 4.000 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | 35.20 GFLOPS | 40.00 GFLOPS |
Dimensions & Outputs
| Slot width | Single-slot | — |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 168 mm 6.6 inches | — |
| TDP | 31 W | 20 W |
| Suggested PSU | 200 W | — |
| Outputs | 1x DVI1x DisplayPort1x VGA | No outputs |
| Power connectors | None | — |
| Board number | P682 | — |
API Support & Features
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | — | — |
| CUDA | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Shader model | 4.1 | 4.0 |
Other Features
Mobile graphics
| Release date | — | Jun 3rd, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | — | GeForce 9M (9500M) |
| Production | — | End-of-life |
| Interface | — | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Predecessor | — | GeForce 8M |
| Successor | — | GeForce 100M |
