NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA NVS 5200M
Graphics Processor
| GPU model | GT218 | GF108 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU variant | GT218-300-A2 | GF108-300-A1 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi |
| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |
| Manufacturing process | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Number of transistors | 260 million | 585 million |
| Die size | 57 mm² | 116 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Release date | Oct 12th, 2009 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | GeForce 200 | — |
| Production | End-of-life | — |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | — |
| Predecessor | GeForce 9 | — |
| Successor | GeForce 400 | — |
Clocks
| GPU clock | 520 MHz | 672 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Shader clock | 1230 MHz | 1344 MHz |
| Memory clock | 400 MHz 800 Mbps effective | 785 MHz 3.1 Gbps effective |
Memory Configuration
| Memory size | 512 MB | 1024 MB |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 bit |
| Bandwidth | 6.400 GB/s | 25.12 GB/s |
Render Configuration
| Shading units | 16 | 96 |
|---|---|---|
| TMUs | 8 | 16 |
| ROPs | 4 | 4 |
| SM count | 2 | 2 |
| Cache L2 | 32 KB | 128 KB |
| Cache L1 | — | 64 KB (per SM) |
Performance
| Pixel rate | 2.080 GPixel/s | 2.688 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Texture rate | 4.160 GTexel/s | 10.75 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | 39.36 GFLOPS | 258.0 GFLOPS |
| FP64 (double) performance | — | 21.50 GFLOPS (1:12) |
Dimensions & Outputs
| Slot width | Single-slot | MXM Module |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 168 mm 6.6 inches | — |
| TDP | 31 W | 25 W |
| Suggested PSU | 200 W | — |
| Outputs | 1x DVI1x DisplayPort1x VGA | No outputs |
| Power connectors | None | — |
| Board number | P691, P873 | — |
API Support & Features
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | — | — |
| CUDA | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Shader model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
Other Features
Mobile graphics
| Release date | — | Sep 17th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | — | NVS Mobile (x200M) |
| Production | — | End-of-life |
| Interface | — | MXM |
| Reviews | — | 26 in our database |
