Intel GMA 950 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Graphics Processor
| GPU model | Calistoga | GP104 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU variant | Calistoga-GME | — |
| Architecture | Generation 3.5 | Pascal |
| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |
| Manufacturing process | 90 nm | 16 nm |
| Number of transistors | unknown | 7,200 million |
| Die size | unknown | 314 mm² |
Integrated Graphics
| Release date | 2006 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | GMA Graphics-M (GMA 950 IGP) | — |
| Production | End-of-life | — |
| Interface | FSB | — |
| Reviews | 1 in our database | — |
Clocks
| GPU clock | 250 MHz | — |
|---|---|---|
| Memory clock | System Shared | 1753 MHz 7 Gbps effective |
| Base clock | — | 1139 MHz |
| Boost clock | — | 1404 MHz |
Memory Configuration
| Memory size | System Shared | 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 192 bit |
| Bandwidth | System Dependent | 168.3 GB/s |
Render Configuration
| Pixel shaders | 4 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Vertex shaders | 1 | — |
| TMUs | 4 | 112 |
| ROPs | 1 | 64 |
| Shading units | — | 1792 |
| SM count | — | 14 |
| Cache L1 | — | 48 KB (per SM) |
| Cache L2 | — | 1536 KB |
Performance
| Pixel rate | 250.0 MPixel/s | 89.86 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Vertex rate | 62.50 MVertices/s | — |
| Texture rate | 1.000 GTexel/s | 157.2 GTexel/s |
| FP16 (half) performance | — | 78.62 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| FP32 (float) performance | — | 5.032 TFLOPS |
| FP64 (double) performance | — | 157.2 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Dimensions & Outputs
| Slot width | IGP | MXM Module |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7 W | 75 W |
| Outputs | No outputs | No outputs |
| Power connectors | — | None |
API Support & Features
| DirectX | 9.0c | 12 (12_1) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | — | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | — | 1.2 |
| Shader model | 3.0 | 6.4 |
| CUDA | — | 6.1 |
Other Features
Mobile graphics
| Release date | — | Feb 21st, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | — | Quadro Mobile (Px200) |
| Production | — | End-of-life |
| Interface | — | MXM-B (3.0) |
