ATI Radeon Xpress 200 IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
Graphics Processor
| GPU model | RC410 | NV36 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Rage 8 | Rankine |
| Manufacturing process | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Number of transistors | unknown | 82 million |
| Die size | 73 mm² | 133 mm² |
| GPU variant | — | FX 5700 Ultra |
| Foundry | — | TSMC |
Integrated Graphics
| Release date | Nov 8th, 2004 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | Radeon IGP (Xpress 200) | — |
| Production | End-of-life | — |
| Interface | PCI | — |
Clocks
| GPU clock | 300 MHz | 475 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Memory clock | System Shared | 453 MHz 906 Mbps effective |
Memory Configuration
| Memory size | System Shared | 128 MB |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR2 |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 bit |
| Bandwidth | System Dependent | 14.50 GB/s |
Render Configuration
| Pixel shaders | 2 | 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Vertex shaders | 2 | 3 |
| TMUs | 2 | 4 |
| ROPs | 2 | 4 |
Performance
| Pixel rate | 600.0 MPixel/s | 1.900 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Vertex rate | 150.0 MVertices/s | 356.3 MVertices/s |
| Texture rate | 600.0 MTexel/s | 1.900 GTexel/s |
Dimensions & Outputs
| Slot width | IGP | Single-slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | unknown | 46 W |
| Outputs | No outputs | 1x DVI1x VGA1x S-Video |
| Length | — | 229 mm 9 inches |
| Suggested PSU | — | 200 W |
| Power connectors | — | 1x Molex |
API Support & Features
| DirectX | 9.0 (9_0) | 9.0a |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 1.5 (2.1) |
| OpenCL | — | — |
| Vulkan | — | — |
| Pixel shader | 2.0 | 2.0a |
| Vertex shader | 2.0 | 2.0a |
Other Features
Graphics Card
| Release date | — | Oct 23rd, 2003 |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | — | GeForce FX |
| Production | — | End-of-life |
| Launch price | — | 199 USD |
| Interface | — | AGP 8x |
| Reviews | — | 6 in our database |
| Predecessor | — | GeForce 4 Ti |
| Successor | — | GeForce 6 AGP |
