AMD Radeon HD 8250 IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
Graphics Processor
| GPU model | Kalindi | G94 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU variant | Kalindi LP | — |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Tesla |
| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |
| Manufacturing process | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 505 million |
| Die size | 110 mm² | 240 mm² |
Integrated Graphics
| Release date | May 23rd, 2013 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | Temash (HD 8000 Mobile) | — |
| Production | End-of-life | — |
| Interface | IGP | — |
| Predecessor | Palm | — |
Clocks
| Base clock | 300 MHz | — |
|---|---|---|
| Boost clock | 400 MHz | — |
| Memory clock | System Shared | 700 MHz 1400 Mbps effective |
| GPU clock | — | 600 MHz |
| Shader clock | — | 1500 MHz |
Memory Configuration
| Memory size | System Shared | 1024 MB |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 bit |
| Bandwidth | System Dependent | 22.40 GB/s |
Render Configuration
| Shading units | 128 | 48 |
|---|---|---|
| TMUs | 8 | 24 |
| ROPs | 4 | 8 |
| Compute units | 2 | — |
| SM count | — | 6 |
| Cache L2 | — | 64 KB |
Performance
| Pixel rate | 1.600 GPixel/s | 4.800 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Texture rate | 3.200 GTexel/s | 14.40 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | 102.4 GFLOPS | 144.0 GFLOPS |
| FP64 (double) performance | 6.400 GFLOPS (1:16) | — |
Dimensions & Outputs
| Slot width | IGP | Single-slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 8 W | 58 W |
| Outputs | No outputs | 1x DVI1x HDMI1x VGA |
| Length | — | 168 mm 6.6 inches |
| Suggested PSU | — | 250 W |
API Support & Features
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | — |
| Shader model | 6.3 | 4.0 |
| CUDA | — | 1.1 |
Other Features
Graphics Card
| Release date | — | Jan 26th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | — | GeForce 200 |
| Production | — | End-of-life |
| Interface | — | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Reviews | — | 27 in our database |
| Predecessor | — | GeForce 9 |
| Successor | — | GeForce 400 |
