AMD Radeon HD 6250 vs ATI Radeon HD 4200 IGP
Graphics Processor
| GPU model | Cedar | RS880 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU variant | Cedar PRO | — |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale |
| Foundry | TSMC | — |
| Manufacturing process | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Number of transistors | 292 million | 181 million |
| Die size | 59 mm² | 67 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Release date | Jan 31st, 2011 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | Northern Islands | — |
| Predecessor | Evergreen | — |
| Successor | Southern Islands | — |
| Production | End-of-life | — |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | — |
Clocks
| GPU clock | 650 MHz | 500 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Memory clock | 500 MHz 1000 Mbps effective | System Shared |
Memory Configuration
| Memory size | 512 MB | System Shared |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | System Shared |
| Bandwidth | 8.000 GB/s | System Dependent |
Render Configuration
| Shading units | 80 | 40 |
|---|---|---|
| TMUs | 8 | 4 |
| ROPs | 4 | 4 |
| Compute units | 2 | 2 |
| Cache L1 | 8 KB (per CU) | — |
| Cache L2 | 128 KB | — |
Performance
| Pixel rate | 2.600 GPixel/s | 2.000 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Texture rate | 5.200 GTexel/s | 2.000 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | 104.0 GFLOPS | 40.00 GFLOPS |
Dimensions & Outputs
| Slot width | Single-slot | IGP |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 168 mm 6.6 inches | — |
| TDP | 19 W | unknown |
| Suggested PSU | 200 W | — |
| Outputs | 1x DVI1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Power connectors | None | — |
| Board number | C026, C027 | — |
API Support & Features
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Vulkan | — | — |
| Shader model | 5.0 | 4.1 |
Other Features
Integrated Graphics
| Release date | — | Aug 1st, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | — | Radeon IGP (HD 4000) |
| Production | — | End-of-life |
| Interface | — | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Successor | — | Sumo |
