ATI Radeon HD 4200 IGP vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
Processeur graphique
| Nom du GPU | RS880 | G98 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla |
| Taille du processus | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Transistors | 181 million | 210 million |
| Taille des matrices | 67 mm² | 86 mm² |
| GPU variant | — | NB9M-GLM |
| Fonderie | — | TSMC |
Carte graphique intégré
| Date de publication | Aug 1st, 2009 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Génération | Radeon IGP (HD 4000) | — |
| Production | End-of-life | — |
| Bus interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | — |
| Successeur | Sumo | — |
Vitesse clock
| GPU clock | 500 MHz | 550 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Mémoire clock | System Shared | 600 MHz 1200 Mbps effective |
| Shader clock | — | 1400 MHz |
Mémoire
| Taille de la mémoire | System Shared | 256 MB |
|---|---|---|
| Type de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR3 |
| Bus mémoire | System Shared | 64 bit |
| Bande passante | System Dependent | 9.600 GB/s |
Render Config
| Shading units | 40 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| TMUs | 4 | 4 |
| ROPs | 4 | 4 |
| Compute units | 2 | — |
| Comptage SM | — | 1 |
| Cache L2 | — | 16 KB |
Performance théorique
| Taux de pixel | 2.000 GPixel/s | 2.200 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Taux de texture | 2.000 GTexel/s | 2.200 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | 40.00 GFLOPS | 22.40 GFLOPS |
Board Design
| Taille Slot | IGP | MXM Module |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | unknown | 20 W |
| Sorties | No outputs | No outputs |
Caractéristiques graphiques
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | — | — |
| Shader model | 4.1 | 4.0 |
| CUDA | — | 1.1 |
AUTRES CARACTÉRISTIQUES
Graphiques mobiles
| Date de publication | — | Aug 15th, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Génération | — | Quadro FX Mobile (x700M) |
| Production | — | End-of-life |
| Bus interface | — | MXM-II |
| Critiques | — | 26 in our database |
