NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce 310M
Graphics Processor
| GPU model | GT216 | GT218 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |
| Manufacturing process | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Number of transistors | 486 million | 260 million |
| Die size | 100 mm² | 57 mm² |
| GPU variant | — | N11M-GE1 |
Graphics Card
| Release date | Oct 12th, 2009 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | GeForce 200 | — |
| Production | End-of-life | — |
| Interface | PCI | — |
| Predecessor | GeForce 9 | — |
| Successor | GeForce 400 | — |
Clocks
| GPU clock | 475 MHz | 606 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Shader clock | 1100 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Memory clock | 400 MHz 800 Mbps effective | 667 MHz 1334 Mbps effective |
Memory Configuration
| Memory size | 512 MB | 1024 MB |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | DDR2 | DDR3 |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 bit |
| Bandwidth | 6.400 GB/s | 10.67 GB/s |
Render Configuration
| Shading units | 16 | 16 |
|---|---|---|
| TMUs | 8 | 8 |
| ROPs | 4 | 4 |
| SM count | 2 | 2 |
| Cache L2 | 32 KB | 32 KB |
Performance
| Pixel rate | 1.900 GPixel/s | 2.424 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Texture rate | 3.800 GTexel/s | 4.848 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | 35.20 GFLOPS | 48.96 GFLOPS |
Dimensions & Outputs
| Slot width | Single-slot | — |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 145 mm 5.7 inches | — |
| TDP | 31 W | 14 W |
| Suggested PSU | 200 W | — |
| Outputs | No outputs | No outputs |
| Power connectors | None | — |
| Board number | P623, P626 | — |
API Support & Features
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 11.1 (10_1) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | — | — |
| CUDA | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Shader model | 4.1 | 4.1 |
Other Features
Mobile graphics
| Release date | — | Jan 10th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | — | GeForce 300M |
| Production | — | End-of-life |
| Interface | — | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Reviews | — | 2 in our database |
| Predecessor | — | GeForce 200M |
| Successor | — | GeForce 400M |
