NVIDIA Quadro K5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Processeur graphique
| Nom du GPU | GK104 | GF110 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Fonderie | TSMC | TSMC |
| Taille du processus | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Transistors | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
| Taille des matrices | 294 mm² | 520 mm² |
Carte graphique
| Date de publication | Aug 17th, 2012 | Jul 25th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Génération | Quadro | Tesla |
| Production | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Prix de lancement | 2,499 USD | — |
| Bus interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Critiques | 26 in our database | — |
Vitesse clock
| GPU clock | 706 MHz | 651 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Mémoire clock | 1350 MHz 5.4 Gbps effective | 924 MHz 3.7 Gbps effective |
| Shader clock | — | 1301 MHz |
Mémoire
| Taille de la mémoire | 4 GB | 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Type de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384 bit |
| Bande passante | 172.8 GB/s | 177.4 GB/s |
Render Config
| Shading units | 1536 | 512 |
|---|---|---|
| TMUs | 128 | 64 |
| ROPs | 32 | 48 |
| Comptage SMX | 8 | — |
| Cache L1 | 16 KB (per SMX) | 64 KB (per SM) |
| Cache L2 | 512 KB | 768 KB |
| Comptage SM | — | 16 |
Performance théorique
| Taux de pixel | 22.59 GPixel/s | 20.83 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Taux de texture | 90.37 GTexel/s | 41.66 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | 2.169 TFLOPS | 1,332 GFLOPS |
| FP64 (double) performance | 90.37 GFLOPS (1:24) | 666.1 GFLOPS (1:2) |
Board Design
| Taille Slot | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
|---|---|---|
| Longueur | 267 mm 10.5 inches | 248 mm 9.8 inches |
| Taille | 111 mm 4.4 inches | — |
| TDP | 122 W | 250 W |
| Suggestions pour le PSU | 300 W | 600 W |
| Sorties | 2x DVI2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Connecteurs de puissance | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Board number | P2004 | — |
Caractéristiques graphiques
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | — |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Shader model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
