NVIDIA Quadro 7000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Processeur graphique
| Nom du GPU | GF110 | GF100 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
| Fonderie | TSMC | TSMC |
| Taille du processus | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Transistors | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
| Taille des matrices | 520 mm² | 529 mm² |
| GPU variant | — | GF100-850-A3 |
Carte graphique
| Date de publication | May 2nd, 2012 | Jul 25th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Génération | Quadro | Tesla |
| Production | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Prix de lancement | 14,499 USD | — |
| Bus interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Critiques | 26 in our database | — |
Vitesse clock
| GPU clock | 651 MHz | 574 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Shader clock | 1301 MHz | 1147 MHz |
| Mémoire clock | 851 MHz 3.4 Gbps effective | 750 MHz 3 Gbps effective |
Mémoire
| Taille de la mémoire | 6 GB | 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Type de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus mémoire | 384 bit | 384 bit |
| Bande passante | 163.4 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Render Config
| Shading units | 512 | 448 |
|---|---|---|
| TMUs | 64 | 56 |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| Comptage SM | 14 | 14 |
| Cache L1 | 64 KB (per SM) | 64 KB (per SM) |
| Cache L2 | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Performance théorique
| Taux de pixel | 18.23 GPixel/s | 16.07 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Taux de texture | 41.66 GTexel/s | 32.14 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | 1,332 GFLOPS | 1,028 GFLOPS |
| FP64 (double) performance | 666.1 GFLOPS (1:2) | 513.9 GFLOPS (1:2) |
Board Design
| Taille Slot | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
|---|---|---|
| Longueur | 248 mm 9.8 inches | 248 mm 9.8 inches |
| Taille | 111 mm 4.4 inches | — |
| TDP | 204 W | 238 W |
| Suggestions pour le PSU | 550 W | 550 W |
| Sorties | 1x DVI2x DisplayPort1x S-Video | 1x DVI |
| Connecteurs de puissance | — | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Caractéristiques graphiques
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | — | — |
| CUDA | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Shader model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
