NVIDIA GeForce 9200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Processeur graphique
| Nom du GPU | C78 | G96 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Taille du processus | 80 nm | 65 nm |
| Transistors | 210 million | 314 million |
| Taille des matrices | 127 mm² | 144 mm² |
| GPU variant | — | NB9P-GLM |
| Fonderie | — | UMC |
Carte graphique intégré
| Date de publication | Apr 17th, 2007 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Génération | GeForce 9 IGP | — |
| Production | End-of-life | — |
| Bus interface | PCI | — |
| Prédécesseur | GeForce 8 IGP | — |
Vitesse clock
| GPU clock | 500 MHz | 625 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Shader clock | 1200 MHz | 1550 MHz |
| Mémoire clock | System Shared | 800 MHz 1600 Mbps effective |
Mémoire
| Taille de la mémoire | System Shared | 512 MB |
|---|---|---|
| Type de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR3 |
| Bus mémoire | System Shared | 128 bit |
| Bande passante | System Dependent | 25.60 GB/s |
Render Config
| Shading units | 16 | 32 |
|---|---|---|
| TMUs | 8 | 16 |
| ROPs | 4 | 8 |
| Comptage SM | 2 | 4 |
| Cache L2 | — | 32 KB |
Performance théorique
| Taux de pixel | 2.000 GPixel/s | 5.000 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Taux de texture | 4.000 GTexel/s | 10.00 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | 38.40 GFLOPS | 99.20 GFLOPS |
Board Design
| Taille Slot | IGP | MXM Module |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40 W | 50 W |
| Sorties | 1x DVI1x VGA1x S-Video | No outputs |
Caractéristiques graphiques
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | — | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | — | — |
| Shader model | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| CUDA | — | 1.1 |
AUTRES CARACTÉRISTIQUES
Graphiques mobiles
| Date de publication | — | Oct 1st, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Génération | — | Quadro FX Mobile (x700M) |
| Production | — | End-of-life |
| Bus interface | — | MXM-II |
| Critiques | — | 26 in our database |
