NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM vs NVIDIA NVS 5200M
Processeur graphique
| Nom du GPU | GT216 | GF108 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi |
| Fonderie | TSMC | TSMC |
| Taille du processus | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Transistors | 486 million | 585 million |
| Taille des matrices | 100 mm² | 116 mm² |
| GPU variant | — | GF108-300-A1 |
Carte graphique
| Date de publication | Sep 3rd, 2010 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Génération | GeForce 400 | — |
| Production | End-of-life | — |
| Bus interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | — |
| Prédécesseur | GeForce 200 | — |
| Successeur | GeForce 500 | — |
Vitesse clock
| GPU clock | 475 MHz | 672 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Shader clock | 1100 MHz | 1344 MHz |
| Mémoire clock | 800 MHz 1600 Mbps effective | 785 MHz 3.1 Gbps effective |
Mémoire
| Taille de la mémoire | 512 MB | 1024 MB |
|---|---|---|
| Type de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Bus mémoire | 64 bit | 64 bit |
| Bande passante | 12.80 GB/s | 25.12 GB/s |
Render Config
| Shading units | 48 | 96 |
|---|---|---|
| TMUs | 16 | 16 |
| ROPs | 8 | 4 |
| Comptage SM | 6 | 2 |
| Cache L2 | 32 KB | 128 KB |
| Cache L1 | — | 64 KB (per SM) |
Performance théorique
| Taux de pixel | 3.800 GPixel/s | 2.688 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Taux de texture | 7.600 GTexel/s | 10.75 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | 105.6 GFLOPS | 258.0 GFLOPS |
| FP64 (double) performance | — | 21.50 GFLOPS (1:12) |
Board Design
| Taille Slot | Single-slot | MXM Module |
|---|---|---|
| Longueur | 168 mm 6.6 inches | — |
| TDP | 25 W | 25 W |
| Suggestions pour le PSU | 200 W | — |
| Sorties | 1x DVI1x HDMI1x VGA | No outputs |
Caractéristiques graphiques
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | — | — |
| CUDA | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Shader model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
AUTRES CARACTÉRISTIQUES
Graphiques mobiles
| Date de publication | — | Sep 17th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| Génération | — | NVS Mobile (x200M) |
| Production | — | End-of-life |
| Bus interface | — | MXM |
| Critiques | — | 26 in our database |
