Intel HD Graphics 405 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
Processeur graphique
| Nom du GPU | Braswell GT1 | G98 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Tesla |
| Fonderie | Intel | TSMC |
| Taille du processus | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Transistors | unknown | 210 million |
| Taille des matrices | unknown | 86 mm² |
| GPU variant | — | NB9M-GE |
Carte graphique intégré
| Date de publication | Apr 1st, 2015 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Génération | HD Graphics-T (Airmont) | — |
| Production | Active | — |
| Bus interface | Ring Bus | — |
| Critiques | 1 in our database | — |
Vitesse clock
| Base clock | 200 MHz | — |
|---|---|---|
| Boost clock | 600 MHz | — |
| Mémoire clock | System Shared | 700 MHz 1400 Mbps effective |
| GPU clock | — | 550 MHz |
| Shader clock | — | 1400 MHz |
Mémoire
| Taille de la mémoire | System Shared | 256 MB |
|---|---|---|
| Type de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR3 |
| Bus mémoire | System Shared | 64 bit |
| Bande passante | System Dependent | 11.20 GB/s |
Render Config
| Shading units | 128 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| TMUs | 16 | 4 |
| ROPs | 2 | 4 |
| Unités d'exécution | 16 | — |
| Comptage SM | — | 1 |
| Cache L2 | — | 16 KB |
Performance théorique
| Taux de pixel | 1.200 GPixel/s | 2.200 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Taux de texture | 9.600 GTexel/s | 2.200 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | 153.6 GFLOPS | 22.40 GFLOPS |
| FP64 (double) performance | 38.40 GFLOPS (1:4) | — |
Board Design
| Taille Slot | IGP | — |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 6 W | 13 W |
| Sorties | No outputs | No outputs |
Caractéristiques graphiques
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | — |
| Shader model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| CUDA | — | 1.1 |
AUTRES CARACTÉRISTIQUES
Graphiques mobiles
| Date de publication | — | Jun 3rd, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Génération | — | GeForce 9M (9000M) |
| Production | — | End-of-life |
| Bus interface | — | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Prédécesseur | — | GeForce 8M |
| Successeur | — | GeForce 100M |
