Intel GMA 950 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Processeur graphique
| Nom du GPU | Calistoga | GM204 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU variant | Calistoga-GME | N16E-Q1-A1 |
| Architecture | Generation 3.5 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Fonderie | Intel | TSMC |
| Taille du processus | 90 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | unknown | 5,200 million |
| Taille des matrices | unknown | 398 mm² |
Carte graphique intégré
| Date de publication | 2006 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Génération | GMA Graphics-M (GMA 950 IGP) | — |
| Production | End-of-life | — |
| Bus interface | FSB | — |
| Critiques | 1 in our database | — |
Vitesse clock
| GPU clock | 250 MHz | 1050 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Mémoire clock | System Shared | 1253 MHz 5 Gbps effective |
Mémoire
| Taille de la mémoire | System Shared | 4 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Type de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus mémoire | System Shared | 256 bit |
| Bande passante | System Dependent | 160.4 GB/s |
Render Config
| Pixel shaders | 4 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Vertex shaders | 1 | — |
| TMUs | 4 | 64 |
| ROPs | 1 | 32 |
| Shading units | — | 1024 |
| Comptage SMM | — | 8 |
| Cache L1 | — | 48 KB (per SMM) |
| Cache L2 | — | 2 MB |
Performance théorique
| Taux de pixel | 250.0 MPixel/s | 33.60 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Vertex rate | 62.50 MVertices/s | — |
| Taux de texture | 1.000 GTexel/s | 67.20 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | — | 2.150 TFLOPS |
| FP64 (double) performance | — | 67.20 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Board Design
| Taille Slot | IGP | MXM Module |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7 W | 75 W |
| Sorties | No outputs | No outputs |
| Connecteurs de puissance | — | None |
Caractéristiques graphiques
| DirectX | 9.0c | 12 (12_1) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | — | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | — | 1.1 |
| Shader model | 3.0 | 6.4 |
| CUDA | — | 5.2 |
AUTRES CARACTÉRISTIQUES
Graphiques mobiles
| Date de publication | — | Aug 18th, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Génération | — | Quadro Mobile (Mx000M) |
| Production | — | End-of-life |
| Bus interface | — | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
