ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
Processeur graphique
| Nom du GPU | R600 | G92B |
|---|---|---|
| GPU variant | R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG) | G92-240-B1 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla |
| Fonderie | TSMC | TSMC |
| Taille du processus | 80 nm | 55 nm |
| Transistors | 720 million | 754 million |
| Taille des matrices | 420 mm² | 260 mm² |
Carte graphique
| Date de publication | Aug 6th, 2007 | Jul 1st, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| Génération | FireGL | GeForce 200 |
| Production | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Prix de lancement | 2,799 USD | — |
| Bus interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Critiques | 5 in our database | — |
| Prédécesseur | — | GeForce 9 |
| Successeur | — | GeForce 400 |
Vitesse clock
| GPU clock | 688 MHz | 675 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Mémoire clock | 868 MHz 1736 Mbps effective | 1100 MHz 2.2 Gbps effective |
| Shader clock | — | 1620 MHz |
Mémoire
| Taille de la mémoire | 2 GB | 1024 MB |
|---|---|---|
| Type de mémoire | GDDR4 | GDDR3 |
| Bus mémoire | 512 bit | 256 bit |
| Bande passante | 111.1 GB/s | 70.40 GB/s |
Render Config
| Shading units | 320 | 112 |
|---|---|---|
| TMUs | 16 | 56 |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| Compute units | 4 | — |
| Cache L2 | 256 KB | 64 KB |
| Comptage SM | — | 14 |
Performance théorique
| Taux de pixel | 11.01 GPixel/s | 10.80 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Taux de texture | 11.01 GTexel/s | 37.80 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | 440.3 GFLOPS | 362.9 GFLOPS |
Board Design
| Taille Slot | Dual-slot | Single-slot |
|---|---|---|
| Longueur | 254 mm 10 inches | 229 mm 9 inches |
| Taille | 111 mm 4.4 inches | — |
| TDP | unknown | 120 W |
| Suggestions pour le PSU | 200 W | 300 W |
| Sorties | 2x DVI1x S-Video | 2x DVI1x S-Video |
| Connecteurs de puissance | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Board number | B313 | P361 |
Caractéristiques graphiques
| DirectX | 10.0 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial) | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | — | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | — | — |
| Shader model | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| CUDA | — | 1.1 |
