ATI FireGL 9800 X2-256T vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM
Processeur graphique
| Nom du GPU | R360 | GT216 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU variant | R360 GL | — |
| Architecture | Rage 9 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Fonderie | TSMC | TSMC |
| Taille du processus | 150 nm | 40 nm |
| Transistors | 117 million | 486 million |
| Taille des matrices | 218 mm² | 100 mm² |
Carte graphique
| Date de publication | Oct 1st, 2003 | Sep 4th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| Génération | FireGL | GeForce 200 |
| Production | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Bus interface | AGP 8x | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Critiques | 5 in our database | — |
| Prédécesseur | — | GeForce 9 |
| Successeur | — | GeForce 400 |
Vitesse clock
| GPU clock | 412 MHz | 475 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Mémoire clock | 344 MHz 688 Mbps effective | 400 MHz 800 Mbps effective |
| Shader clock | — | 1100 MHz |
Mémoire
| Taille de la mémoire | 256 MB | 1024 MB |
|---|---|---|
| Type de mémoire | DDR2 | DDR2 |
| Bus mémoire | 256 bit | 64 bit |
| Bande passante | 22.02 GB/s | 6.400 GB/s |
Render Config
| Pixel shaders | 8 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Vertex shaders | 4 | — |
| TMUs | 8 | 8 |
| ROPs | 8 | 4 |
| Shading units | — | 16 |
| Comptage SM | — | 2 |
| Cache L2 | — | 32 KB |
Performance théorique
| Taux de pixel | 3.296 GPixel/s | 1.900 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Vertex rate | 412.0 MVertices/s | — |
| Taux de texture | 3.296 GTexel/s | 3.800 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | — | 35.20 GFLOPS |
Board Design
| Taille Slot | Single-slot | Single-slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | unknown | 31 W |
| Suggestions pour le PSU | 200 W | 200 W |
| Sorties | 2x DVI | 1x DVI1x DisplayPort1x VGA |
| Connecteurs de puissance | 1x Molex | None |
| Board number | A234-00 | P682 |
| Longueur | — | 168 mm 6.6 inches |
Caractéristiques graphiques
| DirectX | 9.0 | 11.1 (10_1) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | — | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | — | — |
| Pixel shader | 2.0 | — |
| Vertex shader | 2.0 | — |
| CUDA | — | 1.2 |
| Shader model | — | 4.1 |
