ATI FireGL 9800 X2-256 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
Processeur graphique
| Nom du GPU | R360 | G98 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU variant | R360 GL | NB9M-GLM |
| Architecture | Rage 9 | Tesla |
| Fonderie | TSMC | TSMC |
| Taille du processus | 150 nm | 65 nm |
| Transistors | 117 million | 210 million |
| Taille des matrices | 218 mm² | 86 mm² |
Carte graphique
| Date de publication | Mar 1st, 2003 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Génération | FireGL | — |
| Production | End-of-life | — |
| Bus interface | AGP 8x | — |
| Critiques | 5 in our database | — |
Vitesse clock
| GPU clock | 380 MHz | 550 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Mémoire clock | 350 MHz 700 Mbps effective | 600 MHz 1200 Mbps effective |
| Shader clock | — | 1400 MHz |
Mémoire
| Taille de la mémoire | 256 MB | 256 MB |
|---|---|---|
| Type de mémoire | DDR2 | GDDR3 |
| Bus mémoire | 256 bit | 64 bit |
| Bande passante | 22.40 GB/s | 9.600 GB/s |
Render Config
| Pixel shaders | 8 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Vertex shaders | 4 | — |
| TMUs | 8 | 4 |
| ROPs | 8 | 4 |
| Shading units | — | 8 |
| Comptage SM | — | 1 |
| Cache L2 | — | 16 KB |
Performance théorique
| Taux de pixel | 3.040 GPixel/s | 2.200 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Vertex rate | 380.0 MVertices/s | — |
| Taux de texture | 3.040 GTexel/s | 2.200 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | — | 22.40 GFLOPS |
Board Design
| Taille Slot | Single-slot | MXM Module |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | unknown | 20 W |
| Suggestions pour le PSU | 200 W | — |
| Sorties | 2x DVI1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Connecteurs de puissance | 1x Molex | — |
Caractéristiques graphiques
| DirectX | 9.0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | — | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | — | — |
| Pixel shader | 2.0 | — |
| Vertex shader | 2.0 | — |
| CUDA | — | 1.1 |
| Shader model | — | 4.0 |
AUTRES CARACTÉRISTIQUES
Graphiques mobiles
| Date de publication | — | Aug 15th, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Génération | — | Quadro FX Mobile (x700M) |
| Production | — | End-of-life |
| Bus interface | — | MXM-II |
| Critiques | — | 26 in our database |
