ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
Graphics Processor
| GPU model | R600 | GT215 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU variant | R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG) | GT215-450-A2 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |
| Manufacturing process | 80 nm | 40 nm |
| Number of transistors | 720 million | 727 million |
| Die size | 420 mm² | 144 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Release date | Aug 6th, 2007 | Nov 17th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | FireGL | GeForce 200 |
| Production | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Launch price | 2,799 USD | 80 USD |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Reviews | 5 in our database | 49 in our database |
| Predecessor | — | GeForce 9 |
| Successor | — | GeForce 400 |
Clocks
| GPU clock | 688 MHz | 550 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Memory clock | 868 MHz 1736 Mbps effective | 850 MHz 3.4 Gbps effective |
| Shader clock | — | 1340 MHz |
Memory Configuration
| Memory size | 2 GB | 1024 MB |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | GDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bus width | 512 bit | 128 bit |
| Bandwidth | 111.1 GB/s | 54.40 GB/s |
Render Configuration
| Shading units | 320 | 96 |
|---|---|---|
| TMUs | 16 | 32 |
| ROPs | 16 | 8 |
| Compute units | 4 | — |
| Cache L2 | 256 KB | 64 KB |
| SM count | — | 12 |
Performance
| Pixel rate | 11.01 GPixel/s | 4.400 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Texture rate | 11.01 GTexel/s | 17.60 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | 440.3 GFLOPS | 257.3 GFLOPS |
Dimensions & Outputs
| Slot width | Dual-slot | Single-slot |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 254 mm 10 inches | 168 mm 6.6 inches |
| Width | 111 mm 4.4 inches | — |
| TDP | unknown | 69 W |
| Suggested PSU | 200 W | 250 W |
| Outputs | 2x DVI1x S-Video | 1x DVI1x HDMI1x VGA |
| Power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
| Board number | B313 | P680, P681 |
API Support & Features
| DirectX | 10.0 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_1) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial) | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | — | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | — | — |
| Shader model | 4.0 | 4.1 |
| CUDA | — | 1.2 |
