NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Graphics Processor
| GPU model | G92B | G92 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU variant | G92-426-B1 | N10E-GLM3-B2 |
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |
| Manufacturing process | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Number of transistors | 754 million | 754 million |
| Die size | 260 mm² | 324 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Release date | Mar 4th, 2009 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | GeForce 200 | — |
| Production | End-of-life | — |
| Launch price | 199 USD | — |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | — |
| Reviews | 58 in our database | — |
| Predecessor | GeForce 9 | — |
| Successor | GeForce 400 | — |
Clocks
| GPU clock | 675 MHz | 675 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Shader clock | 1620 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| Memory clock | 1008 MHz 2 Gbps effective | 1000 MHz 2 Gbps effective |
Memory Configuration
| Memory size | 1024 MB | 1024 MB |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Bandwidth | 64.51 GB/s | 64.00 GB/s |
Render Configuration
| Shading units | 128 | 128 |
|---|---|---|
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| SM count | 16 | 16 |
| Cache L2 | 64 KB | 64 KB |
Performance
| Pixel rate | 10.80 GPixel/s | 10.80 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Texture rate | 43.20 GTexel/s | 43.20 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | 414.7 GFLOPS | 422.4 GFLOPS |
Dimensions & Outputs
| Slot width | Dual-slot | MXM Module |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 229 mm 9 inches | — |
| TDP | 150 W | 100 W |
| Suggested PSU | 450 W | — |
| Outputs | 2x DVI | No outputs |
| Power connectors | 1x 6-pin | — |
| Board number | P365 | — |
API Support & Features
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | — | — |
| CUDA | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Shader model | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Other Features
Mobile graphics
| Release date | — | Aug 14th, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | — | Quadro FX Mobile (x800M) |
| Production | — | End-of-life |
| Interface | — | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Reviews | — | 26 in our database |
| Successor | — | Quadro Mobile |
