NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
Graphics Processor
| GPU model | G96C | GT216 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla 2.0 |
| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |
| Manufacturing process | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Number of transistors | 314 million | 486 million |
| Die size | 121 mm² | 100 mm² |
| GPU variant | — | GT216 GL |
Graphics Card
| Release date | May 26th, 2009 | Apr 5th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | GeForce 200 | Quadro |
| Production | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Predecessor | GeForce 9 | — |
| Successor | GeForce 400 | — |
| Launch price | — | 169 USD |
| Reviews | — | 26 in our database |
Clocks
| GPU clock | 550 MHz | 450 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Shader clock | 1350 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory clock | 504 MHz 1008 Mbps effective | 770 MHz 1540 Mbps effective |
Memory Configuration
| Memory size | 512 MB | 512 MB |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | DDR2 | DDR3 |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 bit |
| Bandwidth | 8.064 GB/s | 12.32 GB/s |
Render Configuration
| Shading units | 16 | 48 |
|---|---|---|
| TMUs | 8 | 16 |
| ROPs | 4 | 8 |
| SM count | 2 | 6 |
| Cache L2 | — | 32 KB |
Performance
| Pixel rate | 2.200 GPixel/s | 3.600 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Texture rate | 4.400 GTexel/s | 7.200 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | 43.20 GFLOPS | 108.0 GFLOPS |
Dimensions & Outputs
| Slot width | Single-slot | Single-slot |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 168 mm 6.6 inches | 163 mm 6.4 inches |
| TDP | 31 W | 32 W |
| Suggested PSU | 200 W | 200 W |
| Outputs | 1x DVI1x DisplayPort1x VGA | 1x DVI1x DisplayPort |
| Power connectors | None | None |
| Board number | P973 | P1052 |
| Width | — | 69 mm 2.7 inches |
API Support & Features
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_1) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | — | — |
| CUDA | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Shader model | 4.0 | 4.1 |
