ATI Mobility Radeon X200 IGP vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200
Graphics Processor
| GPU model | RS400 | G92 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Rage 8 | Tesla |
| Manufacturing process | 130 nm | 65 nm |
| Number of transistors | unknown | 754 million |
| Die size | 73 mm² | 324 mm² |
| Foundry | — | TSMC |
Integrated Graphics
| Release date | 2005 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | Radeon IGP (Xpress) | — |
| Production | End-of-life | — |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | — |
Clocks
| GPU clock | 300 MHz | 450 MHz |
|---|---|---|
| Memory clock | System Shared | 800 MHz 1600 Mbps effective |
| Shader clock | — | 1125 MHz |
Memory Configuration
| Memory size | System Shared | 512 MB |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 bit |
| Bandwidth | System Dependent | 51.20 GB/s |
Render Configuration
| Pixel shaders | 2 | — |
|---|---|---|
| Vertex shaders | 2 | — |
| TMUs | 2 | 56 |
| ROPs | 2 | 16 |
| Shading units | — | 112 |
| SM count | — | 14 |
| Cache L2 | — | 64 KB |
Performance
| Pixel rate | 600.0 MPixel/s | 7.200 GPixel/s |
|---|---|---|
| Vertex rate | 150.0 MVertices/s | — |
| Texture rate | 600.0 MTexel/s | 25.20 GTexel/s |
| FP32 (float) performance | — | 252.0 GFLOPS |
Dimensions & Outputs
| Slot width | IGP | Single-slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | unknown | 75 W |
| Outputs | No outputs | 2x DVI1x S-Video |
| Power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 229 mm 9 inches |
| Suggested PSU | — | 250 W |
API Support & Features
| DirectX | 9.0 (9_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | — | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | — | — |
| Pixel shader | 2.0 | — |
| Vertex shader | 2.0 | — |
| CUDA | — | 1.1 |
| Shader model | — | 4.0 |
Other Features
Graphics Card
| Release date | — | Jan 8th, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | — | Quadro VX |
| Production | — | End-of-life |
| Interface | — | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Reviews | — | 26 in our database |
